15 Sept 2026, 08:56 AM 3 min readai

Manhattan DA Seizes Dozen Celebrity Deepfake Pornography Websites

Federal and state law enforcement action against online synthetic media abuse escalated significantly on Monday when the Manhattan District Attorney's Office announced the seizure of twelve prominent domains dedicated to distributing non-consensual explicit deepfake videos. Prosecutor Alvin Bragg stated that the coordinated takedowns represent what is likely the largest single enforcement action against commercialized artificial intelligence pornography sites to date. The targeted platforms allegedly hosted manipulated video montages and fully explicit scenes impacting approximately 1,200 individuals, predominantly women, including high-profile public figures, actors, politicians, and social media influencers.
The operation underscores how rapidly the proliferation of accessible artificial intelligence creation tools and automated nudification applications has outpaced regulatory frameworks. According to investigators, the seized domains operated for years, with some archives indicating continuous operation since 2018. Many platforms utilized search-optimized domain names and drew millions of visits by swapping the faces of famous targets into existing adult films, generating substantial traffic and ad-based monetization.

Investigation Origins and Technical Scope

The sweeping enforcement action was triggered after an affected victim came forward to report content hosted on one of the illicit domains, prompting the Manhattan District Attorney's cybercrime bureau to open an inquiry. Ahead of the official announcement, automated security observers noticed homepages across the network replaced with state court seizure notices stating that the domains had been seized under New York State Supreme Court warrants.
While prosecutors did not publicly identify every seized address, independent digital researchers monitoring synthetic media abuse confirmed that the networks utilized robust technical infrastructure and VPN routing. Security analysts noted that much of the material hosted on the seized domains consisted of reposted content originating from older, notorious sharing platforms like MrDeepFakes, which was previously driven offline after investigative unmaskings. Forensic reviews of similar deepfake networks indicate that victims span multiple continents, including dozens of European and American elected officials.

Regulatory Landscape and Federal Legislation

The seizures arrive as lawmakers and prosecutors attempt to leverage newly enacted statutory tools against the multi-million-visitor dark ecosystem of synthetic abuse. In May, federal authorities began rigorous enforcement of the Take It Down Act, a statute signed by President Donald Trump designed to criminalize the online distribution of non-consensual intimate imagery and provide law enforcement with explicit seizure powers over hosting infrastructure.
Legal experts emphasize that while criminalizing distribution is a critical step, dismantling the illicit market requires multi-pronged intervention. Researchers monitoring the space argue that effective containment must target every tier of the commercial abuse pipeline, from foundational open-source generation tools and automated bot apps to payment processors and affiliate monetization networks that allow operators to profit from non-consensual media.

Ongoing Enforcement and Unresolved Proceedings

The Manhattan District Attorney's Office confirmed that criminal investigations into the individuals operating the seized infrastructure, as well as those who uploaded harmful media, remain ongoing. District attorney Alvin Bragg urged additional victims to contact the office's cybercrime bureau as investigators trace backend payment trails and administrator identities.
Authorities have not yet confirmed whether formal arrests have been executed in connection with the twelve domains, and prosecutors declined to disclose specific technical details regarding the backend host providers. Investigations continue into how the operators laundered revenues and whether commercial affiliate networks facilitated the distribution of the synthetic media across international borders.

Sources & Citations

Reporting basis: multiple publisher reports; this is not independent verification.

The Indus Pulse is committed to accuracy and transparency.