June 23, 2026 at 02:08 PM 2 min readindiabreaking

Supreme Court Stays Release Of 1993 Bowbazar Blast Convict Md Rashid Khan

Supreme Court Intervention:

The Supreme Court of India has stayed a Delhi High Court order that granted premature release to Md Rashid Khan, a life-term convict in the 1993 Kolkata Bowbazar blast case. A bench comprising Justice PK Mishra and Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva issued the interim order following a petition by the State of West Bengal, which challenged the earlier judicial directive.

Legal and Historical Context:

The 1993 Bowbazar blast, which occurred on March 16, 1993, resulted in 69 deaths and significant property destruction. While the Delhi High Court had previously relied on a reformative theory of punishment, citing the convict’s 33 years of incarceration and poor health, the Supreme Court noted the gravity of the offenses committed under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act. The State argued that the Sentence Review Board had formally recommended against his release.

Next Legal Steps:

The Supreme Court emphasized that allowing the release would render the State’s appeal infructuous, effectively maintaining the current status of the prisoner. The legal proceedings will now focus on reviewing the High Court's application of reformative philosophy against the state's security and public interest arguments. The case, State of West Bengal v. Md. Rashid Khan, remains pending before the apex court.
Pulse Intelligence
AI Analysis
  • The Bowbazar blast occurred on March 16, 1993, shortly after the Mumbai serial blasts, devastating parts of Kolkata.
  • Md Rashid Khan was convicted under the TADA Act and has remained incarcerated for over three decades.
  • The Delhi High Court had previously ordered his release on June 5, 2026, citing long incarceration and reformative goals.
  • The convict will remain in prison while the Supreme Court considers the State of West Bengal's appeal.
  • The case serves as a critical test for the application of reformative justice in cases involving terrorism convictions.
  • The ruling will likely influence future judicial decisions regarding the premature release of long-term convicts under anti-terror laws.

No direct market impact.